Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Dexter, post: 2525264, member: 1978"] The act was careless which is in the definition of what is an illegal hit. It's the same as one punch can kill which we have been talking about in another thread. You can't use ignorance as a defence and say "oh I didn't know that could happen" . Everyone knows the potential damage a shoulder charge can cause. I still am of the opinion they got this one right and all the others wrong. What they didn't get right was the charge after they had time to look at it. The grading should have been lower considering the circumstances and grade 4s and higher should be reserved for hits like Pritchards and Faosos which cause similar damage. If this is the catalyst to get future shoulder charges properly judged then it can only be good for the game. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 63 (members: 0, guests: 63)