Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2525394, member: 1764"] Pretty much rule on each action as it's viewed. That's what they've always done. Injury that is or isn't caused simply shouldn't be a factor. At least not a significant one. It's like that case with the cement truck driver who ran over a cyclist. The jury was told they had to be certain the truck caused the cyclist to fall, not that the cyclist just fell over. They couldn't. Cement truck driver got off scot free. Could you 100% say that Snowden's actions were the reason Thompson got his face rearranged? Or was the fact he was tackled low, had released the ball and Snowden was more watching the unfolding play a contributor? You get into murky water when you start assuming injuries are caused by the infringement alone. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 105 (members: 0, guests: 105)