Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Shoulder Charges in the Judiciary
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Anonymous person, post: 2525413, member: 2115"] if they CONNECT they should carry the same penalty, yes. doesnt matter if one guy breaks his neck and the other just gets his fringe parted on the other side of his face - they should both be treated the same because the action was the same. why do you think we want CONSISTENCY from the review committee and judiciary? we dont want it to be "well player As shoulder charge was much worse than player Bs, but the guy player B hit stayed down on the ground for longer so player B gets suspended for 7 weeks while player As guy got straight up so he only gets 1" - we want "player A and player B hit a shoulder charge, both get 3 weeks". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Shoulder Charges in the Judiciary
Top