Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="KingWebcke, post: 2525460, member: 8372"] I don't think the argument is that injury [I]shouldn't[/I] come into it, rather just that injury shouldn't play such a significant role in the decision. Injury obviously plays a part here, I mean, if we didn't consider injuries then there probably wouldn't even be a NRL judiciary and we'd let people run around spear tackling and grappling. the issue here is that it is so obvious that injury is basically the [I]only [/I]reason that Snowden has copped such a lengthy ban, since by every other measure, the hit was incredibly innocuous. I don't want to speak for other people like Coxy and AP (since I'm sure they don't all agree with me entirely) but i think the real issue is that injury should play a far smaller role in supplementary discipline, while more emphasis should actually be placed on whether the action and the intent was dangerous. Because it is sad to see a player getting such a massive suspension as a result of bad lack. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 323 (members: 0, guests: 323)