Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2525627, member: 1899"] The interesting point of this whole incident is that it's raised the question on whether injuries should influence referees and the judiciary. The way I see it, the current interpretation reflects our own laws where assaults are classified based on the damage inflicted and I'm okay with this. In regards to this particular matter, Snowden didn't have to turn and lead with his shoulder to brace for Thompson. Where both sides of the argument can agree is that it creates another grey area in the judiciary system which is already murky at best. I believe the penalty handed out to Snowden is a touch high, apart of that was due to prior history but I believe the suspension is 3 weeks too high. I wasn't a fan of prior decisions. Pritchard's suspension in particular was a joke - he's got priors and should have been sidelined for at least 3 weeks. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)