Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Organix, post: 3133508, member: 8187"] Just like every other rule these days. Your points are very good. Honestly, if there were any intelligent conversation that went into rules and regulations like: 6-again 20/40 (some brain) 7 tackle set from an erroneous attacking kick within the 20. (thanks Sowie, you prick) 1 or 2 Referee (make up your mind ffs) The oh-so-successful "crackdown" (good one, Gus) Player challenge (because players are so good at having a better view than the bunker and making their decision in 10 seconds) The bloody bunker (as if that isn't biased and still can't get it right, why no 20/40 for Milf? Annesley: "yeah, mistakes happen") The match review committee (ever so magnanimous to us) We would have such a clean game. At the moment it's a circus where they introduce a new rule or 2 per year. For what? Speed? The product? Fix what is broken first by having better and more discerning, confident refereeing and thought out rule implementation. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 12 (members: 0, guests: 12)