Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2228068, member: 1764"] I think the problem schmix is that the video referee has so much scope for being involved that if a ref makes a decision and it's subsequently proven wrong, and that the video referee could've checked it, they get bagged. If the video referee had no grounds to rule on it anyway, and the decision was made based on what the on field officials saw, then I think there would be less outrage. There would be outrage, but less. Fact is it needs to combine with more clearcut rule interpretations regarding obstructions and ball control. If we take away the "if a defender is contacted in any way" and "separation" type bullshit out of the interpretations it'll be much simpler. If players HAVE to have full control of the ball in their hands to ground it for a try, then there's less debate. You see a bobble in the grounding, it's no try. Probably means the Waterhouse and Thaiday tries yesterday get disallowed, so be it. Anyway, it's all moot discussion anyway. Whatever the coaches decide at their end of season conference will be what happens next year. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)