Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WASSHHH, post: 2947282, member: 9424"] I thought they were both quite poor. I just thought Wallace was better than Napa - but that’s just my opinion. Regardless of that, I couldn’t care less if people have different opinions to me - in fact I think it’s great. It’s what fosters constructive conversation. How they deliver them though, that’s a different story. I can’t stand people thinking their opinion (because this is not black and white, it is entirely subjective) is somehow more valid than someone else’s and that everyone else who dares to have a different one is somehow inferior. As an example specific to this very topic; NRL.com suggests Wallace was better. Fox Sports suggests Napa was better. Two different writers, two different opinions. I personally think the NRL.com review is closer to the mark. [URL]https://www.nrl.com/news/2018/06/06/queensland-maroons-origin-i-player-ratings-inglis-leads-from-the-front/[/URL] [URL]https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/state-of-origin/qld-player-ratings-origin-game-one-2018/news-story/780accebbc1ca77ce3ba82b2e18a7b18[/URL] Stats from NRL.com even suggest the stats on Fox Sports are incorrect. Regardless, as I said in my original comment, we are very light on for props as they were both well short of what we needed last night. [URL]https://www.nrl.com/news/2018/06/06/state-of-origin-queensland-maroons-need-more-from-starting-props/[/URL] [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)