Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
"Storm Cloud" book details Melbourne Storm salary cap scandal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Anonymous person, post: 2516479, member: 2115"] MOD EDIT: If you have a mod complaint, go through the proper channels. Venting publicly is not the right way to go. legally binding contracts arent always upholdable in the eyes of the law. simple things like terms of service for websites are legally binding contracts, but in reality if you take them to court its not a simple 'you signed it, they win' thing. theyre very often found to not be enforceable. having a clause for sleeping with someones wife would be one of those times. i know youre just using that as an example, but the fact is that just because its in a contract doesnt mean its enforceable by law. yes, the player is legally responsible, but they can sue the absolute shit out of the person that they paid to make sure the contract was above board if it turns out its not above board and that person knowingly broke the law. again, thats not true. the NRL will not allow a player to sign for less than they feel the player is worth. this is what was the major problem with gasnier coming back to the NRL was. the dragons wanted him for $50k for 2010, the NRL said no, we wont allow you to sign him for less than his market value. then they doubled that $50k and HUGELY backended his contract so as to get his per-year price up to market value. the NRL allowed it, then he retired so they didnt have to pay out his contract meaning he was never really signed for market value. it was a complete rort, and i have no doubt it was intentionally done. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
"Storm Cloud" book details Melbourne Storm salary cap scandal
Top