Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morkel, post: 2516490, member: 8215"] I was going to include Gasnier in my argument, stating that he's the only exception. But his wasn't about an assigned nominal value either. You made my own argument for me. That debate was because the contract was so heavily back-ended, not because he was worth 'more'. If he'd signed for $50k per year for 3 years ($150k total), the NRL would once again have been suss, but had no grounds to not let it through. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)