Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Anonymous person, post: 2516736, member: 2115"] lol you just dont get it. if parramatta table a deal that is $250k/year for folau the NRL will say "No, his market value is $350k+". it has NOTHING to do with what hes currently being paid. it has NOTHING to do with what parramatta are currently offering him. it is a number that the NRL have determined he is worth per year based on his standing in the game and performance. lets look at a hypothetical: what if lockyer happened to be a multi-billionaire before he even started first grade. 5 years into his career hes killing it, the best player in the game. the NRL values him at $400k/year. he doesnt need or want money, and is prepared to play for $50k/year. the broncos offer him $50k/year, and hes more than happy to accept it. youre saying that the NRL would say "thats fine, sign him up". youre saying the NRL auditors would say "Darren Lockyer, the best player in the game, is worth $50k per year. Steve Michaels on the other hand is worth $200k a year, because thats what his current offer is." do you see how wrong you are? the NRL would say "Darren Lockyer is worth at least $400k a year, you cannot sign him for $50k a year. You must pay him at least $400k a year". that is EXACTLY what they did for inglis and for folau. someone tabled an offer, the offer wasnt as high as what the NRL auditor values him at, the offer was rejected by the NRL auditor. youre making yourself look ridiculous lol. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)