Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2818120, member: 1899"] I haven't seen it myself, but the Titans argued that James didn't willfully make a shoulder charge and it was a natural reaction to protect himself from a collision from his own team-mate. While he was guilty of making a careless tackle with no intention to use either of his arms, the judiciary didn't believe that the contact could be considered forceful and couldn't suspend him under those terms. [MEDIA=youtube]id=409KwXIWuyE;t=35[/MEDIA] ...I think Puletua, Garlick and Cochrane need their eyes checked. Deary me... [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 16 (members: 0, guests: 16)