Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Lockysillegitimatechild, post: 3343766, member: 8814"] I agree with the top half of the convo. The perry comparison wasn't so much like for like, rather an example of a player being able to do a simplified and much easier role to look better with a once in a generation player beside them. I knew the gf would be brought up, but 9/10 that play doesn't happen and then the 78 minutes that he didnt turn up matter. I'm a man of percentages, give me the half who is a constant threat and is in the game for at least 50% of it over a player who MAY come up with a play when all the cards fall their way. The description you've given of him to say he was a good half sounds a hell of a lot more like a strike centre to me, that could have just as easily have been a james Roberts making that play... [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)