Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Sproj, post: 3562376, member: 8423"] He's also had multiple years now where he almost did the year Grand Slam and just dropped one, it is phenomenal. If he was a more likeable bloke, he'd be unquestionably the greatest in my opinion. Nadal is the most unstoppable force I've ever seen when he was at his peak and he was at his peak for a long time but his numbers are skewed somewhat by his huge amount of clay wins (and this is not a negative comment at all overall). Federer was a magician, he was the most beautifully skilled player I've ever seen but to me, he is actually the one who isn't in this discussion of the three if I am being brutally honest because overall, these other two had his measure more than he had theirs. Federer was just so smooth, he made tennis an art form and that puts him on a different level to the other two but not as good in terms of pure results. Djoker on the other hand is probably the smartest of the three on the court. He has the ability to play on any court, he has no weakness BUT he does have the benefit of winning a lot of Slams in the backend of Nadal and Federer's career and given they are all similarish ages, this to me puts him above because he has maintained his unbelievably high level for longer. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)