Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1910, post: 3463541, member: 8272"] Lords and the Oval weren't in his favour and he finished with one less wicket than Anderson and five less than Broad playing one less game and at a better average. I don't think he looked average at all in Melbourne, 1 wicket sure but they couldn't score off him. 28 overs is massive. He was the most economical bowler, off the same number of overs Rabada went for 55 more runs. He showed versatility in his bowling. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)