Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
The 18 th Man
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Ken Oath, post: 2441588, member: 7853"] Instead of calling it an 18th man, let's simply call it a permanent reserve. A reserve that is available to be used by a coach to permanently replace another player irrespective of whether the player he replaces is injured (by foul play or otherwise) or simply hooked for a brain explosion. We do not need any more discretionary rules coming into our game. Only allowing such a replacement following foul play makes for far too much discretion by officials and we definitely don't need any more of that. Nearly everyone in the game is in favour of reducing the number of interchanges in our game. In order to accommodate this as well as avoid situations like the Moi Moi incident against the Bullldogs, I think the bench should be reduced to 3 players on a rotation of 6 interchanges. A 4th player would also be sitting on the bench and would be be available to slot into the 3 man rotation in the event of a player being injured (whether through foul play or otherwise). In the Moi Moi incident, the permanent reserve would have come onto the bench as soon as the Eels medical staff declared Fui Fui unfit to return and hence permanently replaced by the permanent reserve. Parramatta would still have had their full 3 man rotation for the rest of the game (unless of course someone else was badly injured). In the Moi Moi incident, his replacement would not have counted towards the 6 interchanges as it was forced through foul play. Coaches could choose to employ their permanent reserve strategically if they wished just as long as the player the permanent reserve replaces does not return to the field. In my view this minor change would assist in both alleviating situations where teams are unfairly disadvantage by early injuries and also assist in bringing the endurance element back into the contest as well as providing coaches with good strategic opportunities Any thoughts on this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
The 18 th Man
Top