Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Dexter, post: 2698969, member: 1978"] Napa has to go if they are fair dinkum. He clearly made a choice to use his shoulder when he could have made contact another way. He didn't brace but drove through making sure the impact was substantial. Very nice of Fox to have Maloney on tellie critiquing why he thought Napa would get off. What a joke, and this practice of all the commentators having there say seems a bit off to me. If the NRL want to run the judiciary similar to a legal system then surely they should restrict or ban comment on incidents that have put on report until after the hearing. There is so much variation from the media as too the outcome and it is clear the judiciary members are paying too much attention. The hit on Tamou doesn't seem to have raised an eyebrow but his injury was caused by a shoulder charge, make no mistake, though because there was another defenders arm between the player shoulder charging and Tamou it hasn't been charged. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)