Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="papabear, post: 2548737, member: 8480"] From a raiders fans perspective. 2006 was a farce, the ref was generous in the gf and the terrible finals system allowed the broncos to be their in the first place. The only thing somewhat redeeming about it was melbourne was probably cheating the salary cap at the time? IMO the tigers run was a less of a fluke, they were dominant for the back half of the season and only st george came close (the team who killed brisbane in the finals next year) but poor old cooper couldnt catch. Either way they won a lot in a row and were never challanged in the back end of the season except by st george who they beat in the said challenge. 1992 fair enough. 1993 - imo the raiders would have won if stuart didn't get injured in one of the later rounds. but again a good finals run nonetheless and worthy champions in the end, who can forget st george cant play. where they were truely dominate was 97 - 2000 97 SL GF winners and to be honest they would have pumped newcastle. 98 NRL GF winners - in emphatic fashion as well. 2000 NRL GF winners [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)