Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Emma, post: 2214080, member: 1772"] There would have definitely still been a penalty! He never had eyes for the ball, and he hit him without the ball. That's a penalty regardless of whether or not the bloke gets hurt. Not sure if we'll see a lot more of it (I don't think too many players would be stupid enough to do it so blatantly!), but if there is I agree there will possibly be a change to the rules or to the charges that can be brought against a player. If memory serves me correctly, didn't Stewart just get to the ball before being hit, or it was simultaneous? Williams was no where near the ball when he got smashed. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)