Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="broncos4life, post: 2576497, member: 7802"] IMO two weeks was enough but at the same time I can understand how they came to that punishment. They were saying on nrl 360 that they try to run the judiciary in the same process as a court of law, where they take out the emotion and just look solely at facts. If you think of this like a negligence case to me it becomes understandable. A negligence case is like a formula of does the persons training/knowledge hold them higher than the average joe, should they have known not to do what they did and what is the consequence of them doing what they had been trained not to do. With that in mind I can see how they get 7 weeks. Yes there was no malice or intent in the tackle, yes there have been far worse tackles that have received no punishment. But removing all that and all the emotion, the player knew that any lift can go awry and through performing the lift he lead directly to a player potentially never walking again [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)