Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Jason Simmons, post: 3164178, member: 8275"] Telecommunications (Interception and Authority) Act doesn’t mention Anthony Seibold or European ‘cyber investigators’ last time I checked it... There is a fundamental problem with IP addresses in Australia, with respect to data retention. DNS records and the IP addresses connected to aren’t retained, because that’s a way to determine content, not just meta-data. So unless an enforcement agency is actually capturing telecommunications on a named person or a particular service (fixed line, mobile etc) via a TI Warrant, there IS no history of what a particular person has done with their device, except on the device itself, or what may be captured by an app (at the other end) or website. Which is where Seibold runs into a problem. He has to identify these people, then restrain them via court order actually wiping their devices, before his forensic computer experts can get their hands on them. PS, on an unrelated note boiling your phone is an excellent way of stuffing it beyond useability (to ANYONE, including a forensic computer examiner) as well as providing an excellent argument for it being accidentally , not deliberately destroyed... Your honour, I’m a massive pasta fan, clearly just like Seibs... 😆😆😆 [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)