Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Culhwch, post: 2452645, member: 1983"] The problem with this idea is that if you get rid of the video refs, we're still living in an age of super slow mo instant replies of everything, so when the on-field ref gets something wrong, they're the ones who get crucified instead of the men upstairs. For every fan who would cop the obvious-in-hindsight bad decisions, I'd wager there would be more than one who would scream blue murder, especially if it cost his team the game. It's been brought up here any number of times (which makes me wonder why it's so obvious to us and not to the idiots running the game) but the benefit of the doubt rule is the biggest contributer to the current abysmal state of video refereeing. Give benefit of the doubt to the defending team and I bet that one change improves the refereeing no end. Also can the second referee on the field, and allow for challenges to bad calls, and you're on the road to a fairer game and better product. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)