Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
The Thurston myth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2201047, member: 1764"] When are people going to wake up and realise that Thurston isn't a halfback? His best attribute is his running game. His passing game is average, his kicking game is serviceable, and his organisation skills are below par IMO. Why do Australia and Queensland persist with selecting him at halfback and in turn lumbering Lockyer with most of the organisational responsibilities? I for one would feel much better having Prince at halfback. He's excellent with ball in hand close to the line, but also works flawlessly with his forwards to get a roll on up field. And he has the best kicking game in the NRL bar none. So when will people take their channel 9 antennae out of their heads and realise Thurston is a five-eighth or a bench utility? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
The Thurston myth
Top