Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
The Thurston myth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Hamm.0, post: 2201131, member: 1852"] RORZ@this thread. JT might be a natural 5/8th, however dropping him is a LOLZable thought process. And furthermore, to make any change to the QLD halves, it would make far more sense to move JT to 5/8th, Prince at 7 and drop Lockyer. Now all you blinded fools will scream murder, so let me remind you of some very interesting stats to go with that "With Thurston at halfback, QLD have won 5/10, with Prince at halfback, QLD have won 3/5" stat; SoO 2006 Game 3 (just after halftime for the Tate try, to bring us within striking distance) SoO 2007 Game 3 SoO 2008 Game 3 Also, Thurston is 3 times the defender Lockyer is. Make no mistake, I think Lockyer is a God and am in no way trying to say JT is a superior player (I also feel perhaps at club level Cowboys could play him at 5/8th, although I see no problem with him at 7), however at SoO, short of injury or [i]massive[/i] form slump by himself or Lockyer, JT will be the halfback and rightfully so. The man sweats QLD and whilst Lockyer is in the team, is [u]the most important man in the halves[/u]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
The Thurston myth
Top