Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Jeba, post: 2368423, member: 1827"] I disagree. I think 2010 was one of the worst in memory as far as competitiveness goes. The Dragons were just head and shoulders. This year is a lot harder for them. Melbourne are the obvious contenders, but I think Tigers, Broncos, Manly, Bulldogs are all showing good signs that they can beat either of them on their day. The Bulldogs took it to the Dragons last week and it could've been a very different story had Boyd not taken that intercept. As far as the rest of them go: Eels - look ordinary, spoon contender for sure. Titans - see above, but capable of upsets here and there Warriors - they're better than their early season form but very hot and cold Cowboys - on their day can beat anyone, should make a go of it in the finals Raiders - look in all sorts, get the feeling they will make a late run but will be too late if they keep up their form Roosters - look ordinary, will struggle IMO Knights - could scrape in the 8 but probably easybeats in the first week Sharks - will upset a few, as have done already, but in the end will be a bit too much for them Panthers - lot of work to do Souths - can't contend with their halves Overall I think this year's competition is a big step up from last year as far as quality goes. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 15 (members: 0, guests: 15)