Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WASSHHH, post: 3044051, member: 9424"] Yes the OP has an agenda against Seibold, everyone has seen that in most of their posts since Bennett got the sack. But I don’t think the point, this time at least, is agenda driven. Indeed, it could very well be bang on. Seibold hasn’t dropped Boyd even though everyone can see he should, so I don’t think there’s anything to suggest he was going to do so with McCullough. Particularly given no one was banging down the door in reserve grade demanding to take his place. Moral to the story, FFS, drop Boyd. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)