Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Renegade, post: 2651039, member: 1928"] By standing out in the limited opportunities they have, especially as a back. Most young backs will do something special in their first 20 games that makes you go hmm, he's worth persevering with. Sailor did, Tuquiri did, Yow Yeh did, Boyd did. I'm sure if you look at most good-to-premier backs in the comp, they've all had at least one moment in their first dozen or so games that makes you go hmm. Kahu hasn't. I challenge you to list one thing he's done at FG level in the limited time he's had underlines this supposed potential he has. My point is, I don't think he's a [B]bad[/B] player, just that he's nothing more than average. That's why I'm asking for proof from others, because others are the ones rating him as this supposed next big thing for us when i don't see it. Milford has shown much, much more than Kahu has, there's no point comparing the two. While the Nikiorima boys look good in u20, most have kept a grounded perspective on them and stated let's see how they go in Q Cup etc before waxing lyrically about them. What a ridiculous statement. I'm not bagging him on the basis of what I haven't seen - I'm simply putting forward an opinion on what I [B]have[/B] seen, and what I have seen of him, at the only level that actually matters (first grade), he's done nothing imo to justify anything more than being a solid player. As for bagging out others? Please cite where I've bagged out others, unless of course claiming others rate him more highly than I do and asking for examples that can correlate with their elevated opinion of him is bagging others, in which case harden the **** up. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now