Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3031144, member: 1992"] The article came out because a journalist decided to follow up the facts around this commonly made accusation. The accusation was that WB signed Boyd, who WB had looked after as he might a son, to an overly favourable contract. The journalist sought out the facts of the matter and it was how the more reasonable amongst us thought. WB told the Broncos he wanted Boyd and the board agreed. WB left the board to do it's thing which it did. If you have a presupposition then these facts may not suit your narrative but it's out there and statements from one person who was absolutely central in the negotiations is totally at odds with the accusation. If anybody could tell you who they dealt with it would be the person making the contract. That should be good enough for a reasonable person. WB DIDN'T give Boyd a contract. Deal with it. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)