Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2475883, member: 1764"] Agreed. Sufficient is like "beyond reasonable doubt", where as conclusive is "no doubt". So I can understand that the video referee felt there was sufficient evidence to say no try - however, I disagree. Likewise if the original decision was no try, I would be fine with them sticking with that call. It was line ball. Hence, under the spirit of this new interpretation, IMO that's a try. But the bottom line is it still comes down to the video referee's opinion. No system will ensure 100% agreement. I know some people are bitching that the video referee is being used more as a butt coverer. I don't actually mind since most of the decisions get made after 1 or 2 replays [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)