Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OXY-351, post: 2477679, member: 2107"] The presence of enough doubt that a player may have actually scored? I think the point Coxy and AP are trying to make was that in this particualr case, the video ref was in no doubt that he was pulled up short of the line. Even disgregarding the new rules and assuming it was 2012, the video ref would have still ruled no try rather than a benefit of the doubt rule as, in his mind, there was no doubt. I disagree with the video refs ruling, as I personally thought there was enough doubt to stick with the on field refs decision, which just happened to be a try, but that's just it - it comes down to a personal perception of what took place. if you put a different video ref in that box that night, it may have been a try. That's why i think they should have more video refs in big games, so it comes down a general consensus rather than a single viewpoint. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)