Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morkel, post: 2520837, member: 8215"] In contrast, I actually think McCullough's "no try" was the correct call. There was more than 50% doubt that he'd dropped it. But it was the wrong decision by the rules - in that there was still some doubt as to whether he retained posession, and therefore the "try" as called by the ref should have stood. I just can't understand how the NRL don't understand such a simple concept as 50:50. **** the ref having to make a decision on something he may not clearly see, because it means any 99% calls are going to have to defer to the refs decision. Video ref it, if it's 50% (or more) likely that it was a try, call a try. If it's 51% (or more) likely that it's a no try, disallow it. It's not that fucking hard, but people are too busy trying to protect the referees from scrutiny than actually trying to have correct decision making. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 32 (members: 0, guests: 32)