Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rnabokov, post: 2490855, member: 1847"] Beads, if our halves were as shit as all that, we wouldn't be playing as well as we are. Yes, it's somewhat inconsistent, but IMO, we have given 4 of the top teams a serious run for their money. I though Wallace organizes the attack pretty well on the left. Our SUPPORT PLAY, or lack of it is much more a worry than Wallace. Wallace isn't the entire problem either. Years and years of coaching a flat attack is one problem, which makes 2nd man plays tricky, and Norman's ego SUCKS although his timing is getting better when he comes into the line. Prince IMO was the main catalyst for at least 2 of our best performances in attack. Where the real problem lies IMO is the dummy half - totally uncreative at best despite solid defence, and a coach who has taken what, 2 years? to get a semblance of an effective left side attack working with the FB at last coming up into the line and, ego explosions aside, passes the ball. In my view, the middle third is where the creative vacuum is, and dummy half in general, and a coach/club who seemingly doesn't want to do much about it. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 344 (members: 0, guests: 344)