Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="john1420, post: 3582275, member: 2077"] I'd like for someone with more knowledge than me to answer this (or correct me) but my memory says 'no'. IIRC, Bennet has said the reason for Locky's switch to 6 was because we had Hunt knocking the door down to play 1, and we had a 1 who he believed could play 6 (I think maybe Locky played some 6 in juniors?) and finally, the team needed a 6. The circumstances were perfect. So if Hunt is in the equation, the Broncos are looking for a 6 and leaving Locky at 1. Well that's my recollection anyway. As for the OP question, no, Walsh stays where he is. It would need the same set of perfect circumstances to consider it. As of now we are not in that position. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 107 (members: 0, guests: 107)