Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2926874, member: 1992"] Gee, you'd think having a few diplomas would help in understanding that statements were in fact evidence but apparently you were asleep during those lectures ! You did write that statements weren't evidence. My reference to 60 years was about naivety and not in relation to what constitutes evidence. There's speculation and informed speculation and one is clearly of greater value. I do wonder why you find it necessary to offer up your reasoning when defending your uninformed speculation. Of course I suppose you could just say you made a mistake when stating that statements weren't evidence when of course any person who has studied some of the sciences would admit they are indeed a form of evidence. I see no reason to call either man a liar, indirectly or outright. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)