Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="lynx000, post: 3372145, member: 2065"] For the third or fourth time I think now. Firstly, you understand that we are talking two contracts here. Haas has a contract with Orr's agency. That contract addresses the terms of Orr's business as his agent including the commission he is entitled to, the obligations of each parties. Separately, Haas has an NRL player's contract with the Broncos. The contract that is the subject of the legal dispute is the first contract. That is the contract that Haas is attempting to have voided, not the second contract. How do I know this, because that is what has been reported, Haas has confirmed that he is here until 2024 and there has been no mention of him challenging the Broncos contract. I have checked the QLD and NSW court registries and no court action has been filed by Haas against the Broncos. In the proceedings against Pacific Sports Management, the court cannot make an order invalidating or voiding the separate contract with the Broncos unless the Broncos are a party to the litigation (they are not) and are given a right to be heard. That is the source of my information. The basis of my opninion is 28 years of practice, 3 law degrees and over 300 trials. Can I ask you for your sources for the contrary view that the contract with the Broncos is at risk because of these court proceedings? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)