Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="lynx000, post: 3372260, member: 2065"] Once again, two separate contracts here. If the misrepresentation came from the Broncos in relation to the NRL playing contract, yes you are correct. Depending on the nature of the misrepresentation he may be able to challege the contract. If the misrepresentation came from the agent, the agent is acting on behalf of Haas. It would give him a right of action against the agent but in my view it would not enable him to avoid a contract he signed with an innocent third party. I asked you earlier for your source or sources for this information that you are relying on, you did not provide it. If it is the article by Rothfield, forget it, he would not know which direction his ass was pointing. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 88 (members: 0, guests: 88)