Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Sproj, post: 2751880, member: 8423"] Look at what Granville has offered NQ, he has already won a premiership with them and was one of the best on ground in said GF. If Macca was an 80 minute hooker, you could argue that gives him an edge over Granville in that one area but as much he probably can do it, he isn't an 80 minute hooker because we have KNik too. You tell me how a tag team of Granville-KNik is NOT a more attractive offer than Macca-KNik. Parcell is a gun but is being stifled in the Sea Eagles system where he has to feed it to DCE and Walker/Lyon who constantly do their best to stink it up. I'll concede that on Parcell's showing for Manly thus far, it has been far more underwhelming than I thought it would be. I did always rate Baptiste and he is going well for the Raiders so hard to know how he would have gone in Macca's position. Regardless, Granville is the one we should have kept. He offers a lot in defence (not as much as Macca for sure but not horribly less so) but also offers speed out of dummy half and one of the finest services in the NRL (something Macca definitely lags behind in though he has improved). I am not bagging out Macca by the way but just saying that if we still had one or two of those other options, we wouldn't really lose that much (and in the case of Granville actually add something) with Macca being out. He is a more than decent hooker but we could be awesome with Granville. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)