Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2331963, member: 1764"] ^^^ This. I'm not laying the blame of our season solely at Wallace's feet. Just need to see my 4 other "negatives" to see that. But that Tigers game really shows me how incapable he was this season of taking control of this team. And that worries me post-Lockyer. Before anyone starts blabbering about how "Wallace isn't the captain, he's not a senior player, Parker and Thaiday are" blah blah, Wallace is, when Locky's not there, the backline general. That's his job. In fact, that was meant to be his job even when Locky was there, to try and take that pressure of his shoulders. Would Wallace have gone better if we had a decent front row? Yes. Would Wallace have gone better if we hadn't had so many injuries at key times? Yes. Would Wallace have gone better if Locky played every game? Yes. But that's all irrelevant. Fact is we need Wallace to stand up in those situations where our pack isn't on top, our team is understrength and the great man isn't there. 2010 is an abject failure for P. Wallace, and 2011 is make or break for him. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 343 (members: 0, guests: 343)