Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Porthoz, post: 2332005, member: 2221"] I understand both your points and ignoring AP's usual exageration, I also don't disagree with both of you that Wallace was below par this season. I just believe that the 5 factors I mentioned were of more importance to our season than Wallace, and that many of those points definitely affected Wallace's performances also. Thurston, Prince, Cronk are the only half backs out there that could have the influence you demand on such a young team, and no… Wallace is not in their league! Look at the good performing HB’s besides those 3 in the comp and you’ll see they all have a very good pack in front of them, right Maloney, right Pearce, right Hornby? Yet, I wouldn’t replace Wallace with any of them! [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 230 (members: 0, guests: 230)