Round 5 Discussion

Have they changed the interpretation of the obstruction rule? The Titans were just called back for an obstruction that literally didn't affect anything. There was no defender in the vicinity, no defender was impeded or touched, no defender would've behaved any differently had the Titans play not even existed.

So strange.
 
Last edited:
Watene Zelezniak is a fucking sooky ****, harden the **** up
 
Peachey is a dope.

There wasn't even half a chance there.
 
Maloney has a point but lately they have been giving penalty tries if they think the player would have scored.

There was a time it had to be guaranteed they would have scored but not anymore.
 
Super Freak said:
Maloney has a point but lately they have been giving penalty tries if they think the player would have scored.

There was a time it had to be guaranteed they would have scored but not anymore.
Click to expand...

Thing is, the obstruction from the Panthers impeded Cartwrights attempt. It doesn’t matter that he still got to the ball, it would’ve been easier if he had of got a clear run to the ball.
 
Last edited:
Kick on play one when you're 50m out from the line.

Penrith have self-destructed.
 
Exactly the same as the Bronco's the other night. 4 forward rucks then one pointer, how hard is it?
 
Awful last play there from James.

All he had to do was die with the ball in the corner, now he's given up a 7 tackle set.
 
New Posts

Unread

Active Now

No members online now.
Total: 123 (members: 0, guests: 123)
Top