- Apr 26, 2008
- 34,578
- 35,550
Dexter said:Agree with all of that, just didn't agree with Roger that on a points system Liilyman is better than Prince
He has played more rep games so technically he is a better player than scott prince.
Dexter said:Agree with all of that, just didn't agree with Roger that on a points system Liilyman is better than Prince
Coxy said:Yeah, problem is as we all know, stats alone are not sufficient to judge a player by. There's intangibles marquee players bring to clubs and that needs to be measured somehow.
It's almost like you need to do a survey of players, administrators and fans to get a "feeling" rating!
Roger Explosion said:The best, and only reliable measure of the value of a player is the amount another club will pay to steal him.
lockyer47 said:It's a real iffy issue that seems to be growing doesn't it?
I think the cap was more effective before when players were actually getting paid what they were "really" worth, the market value of players has just inflated ridiculously in comparison to the cap limit. I've been saying this for the last couple of years.
In my opinion, with a 4m salary cap (back then it was 3.25 of course) only the TOP TIER players should get paid anything above 400k and MAX 500k ish, Im talking Lockyer, Joey and Fittler over the last few years and thats it. all the so called 400l players now are worth 300k in relation to the cap limit and so forth.
so for eg. Word on the street is that Quinn signed recently for about $240k a year, I believe he is worth $150k ish a year in RELATION to the cap limit. I hope this makes sense!
The argument is, it is unfair on players, and that I understand, but i think all salaries should be based relative to the cap limit.
A good argument for the other side is, the player is worth what clubs are willing to pay for them, and I got nothing much to say back to that.
So in a way, I guess what I am saying MAY be what stupid Dennis is saying! I suppose I do beleive the market value of players are overpriced!!! but i STRESS!!! in accordance to the CAP LIMIT!!!
and we all know why we cant riase the cap to some ridiculus amount, because that is not the answer.