Cowboys v Souths spoilers

Jeba

International
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
6,501
Reaction score
244
Bloody hell Cowboys how the hell did you lose that one??? [icon_lol1.

Up 28-4 with all possible momentum, and lost 29-28!!!!!!!!!!!!!

One of the most bizarre finishes to a game in history!!!!!

I like the Cowboys, but that just had me laughing [icon_lol1.
 
All I can say is go Souths. I might need to go the Dr to check my blood pressure, it is through the roof after that game. I don't know why Cowboys didn't go for the penalty goal in the dying seconds?
 
Twiztid said:
All I can say is go Souths. I might need to go the Dr to check my blood pressure, it is through the roof after that game. I don't know why Cowboys didn't go for the penalty goal in the dying seconds?

Differential penalty, not allowed to.

They shouldn't have kicked it to be closer than the 10 metre line for the tap though.
 
How many times did the ref go to the video ref.
 
Really, didn't know that? Still that was a stupid penalty call in my opinion as the ref let the play run till Cowboys kicked it away. It was like Union advantage. But ya they needed to be in between 10 - 20 metres to get the set up for the field goal. I think they thought they could go back to the 10 anyways and just set up from there.

However great fight back. If this was earlier in the year and without Sandow, Luke, Baz, Asotasi and Wing we would not have won this game. Heads would have dropped and that would have been that.
 
Right at the end I was thinking shit they are gonna go for penalty goal here and its all over red rover. Phew...how good was that!!! I don't like that much suspense.
 
Souths were dead lucky to get that strip penalty near the end, it was a straight drop. Good luck to them anyway coming back from 28 - 4 down was a good win.
 
The Rock said:
How shit are BOTH teams! [icon_lol1. How the hell could Souths be 28-4 down against the COWBOYS (minus Thurston!) That is absolutely disgraceful.

And how, after leading 28-4, did the Cowboys lose against...Souths!!!!! [icon_lol1.
[icon_lol1. [icon_lol1. [icon_lol1. [icon_lol1. [icon_lol1.

lmao, so true.
 
The Rock said:
[quote="Frank the Tank":2c28kyhs]terrible whats happened to webb - shouldve been picked in origin so wouldve sat out this weekend, wouldnt have broken his ankle, and would help QLD win the origin series. talk about bad luck.

What is your obsession with Webb. He should NEVER have been selected in origin. Why would you even change the team that won in game 2? Webb is crap, admit it.[/quote:2c28kyhs]

People still think of that try in 2001. If Webb was pulled up just short of the line in that game people wouldn't be so obsessed with him.

I fully agree with you Rocky, based on the team performance in game 2 coupled with Webb's shite form in Origin over the last few years there is no way he should even get a look in.
 
There is many good players missing from the Cowboys not just Thurston.
Souths should have just walked away 50-0 with what the Cows had to put on the paddock and losing Webb during the game as well.Not to mention Bluey Southern I don't think was 100%fit for some of that game.
Souths had a strong side(for Souths ) on paper.

In saying all that Cows need a good boot up the bum for letting the lead of 20 just slip away and go to sleep thinking they had done enough.
 
Looks like (yet another) wooden spoon on the way for "the most dominant team in Qld".

Christ, it doesn't get much better than seeing Souths lose, but seeing the Cows cement a spot on the foot of the ladder is AWESOME!
 
Frank the Tank said:
terrible whats happened to webb - shouldve been picked in origin so wouldve sat out this weekend, wouldnt have broken his ankle, and would help QLD win the origin series. talk about bad luck.

And if he hadn't eaten all those pies and got so fat he might not have broken his ankle either.

Go figure.
 
The Rock said:
How shit are BOTH teams! [icon_lol1. How the hell could Souths be 28-4 down against the COWBOYS (minus Thurston!) That is absolutely disgraceful.

And how, after leading 28-4, did the Cowboys lose against...Souths!!!!! [icon_lol1.
I don't understand either. Bloody hell...how can you be winning 28-4 against Souths and then lose??? One of life's mysteries!
 
Frank the Tank said:
[quote="The Rock":9rn6nwan]
No...no he's not. Can you even remember the last quality game Webb had in origin? I cannot believe you'd prefer him over Hannant or Thaiday in origin. Anyway, not going to argue because I really don't care - I just wished QLD picked Webb so NSW can destroy him again.
the one where he smashed bailey 3 times in a row icon_thumbs_u

hannant has done nothing in his 2 games, made very few metres and i honestly cant remember a single thing he did. thaiday is much the same but makes a few more metres, but if possible is even less of a threat with the ball in hand since he drops quicker than ennis as soon as a defender lays a hand on him.[/quote:9rn6nwan]

In Origin 1, Webb made 4 hit-ups, as a starting front rower. That is absolutely pathetic at any level let alone Origin and especially in the front row. I also remember looking at the stats from Game 3, 2006 where he only made 9 tackles and 6 hit-ups. Pathetic!!!

Let's compare all 3 then - Webb, Hannant and Thaiday - based on their performances in Game 1. They were all there so it's the most fair comparison.

Webb - 13 tackles, 4 hit-ups.
Hannant - 18 tackles, 6 hit-ups.
Thaiday - 27 tackles, 8 hit-ups.

Webb has a much lower work rate then both of them and as a starting front rower that is unacceptable. Would you ever see those stats in Steve Price or Petero Civoniceva's game? NO. Webb is indeed a myth and one of the most over-rated players in the game.
 
If I recall correctly didn't Webb play bugger all minutes coz he's a fat heap with no condition?
 
I will walk from brisbane to sydney naked if Carl Webb has been averaging 60+ minutes.

He is one of the least fit players in the comp, he gives away penalty after penalty when he is fatigued.

He's a good impact player, but until he improves his work rate and mobility he will always be an overrated hack.
 

Active Now

No members online now.
Top