Cullen: We Don't Want Greg

ningnangnong

HACK THE PLANET!!!
Forum Staff
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
30,193
Reaction score
19,228
Can't find it on the net, but there was an article in yesterday's paper about how Greg Eastwood is leaving Leeds, but Bruno has said we can't fit him in next season.

Thought you guys would like to know.
 
I was thinking you ment Greg Inglis after reading the headline. We probally cant fit him because we have signed Inglis [icon_pray. and Hannant and we have to re-sign Thaiday end of next year. We have plenty of backrowers and we dont need another front rower really with Kenny, Anderson, Hannant, Tronc, Dodds and McGuire
 
Yep, i'd rather us sign another gun frontrower than another backrower.

We've got plenty of talented backrowers as it is
 
I don't think we would have a place for Beastwood next year
 
Eastwood seems not to be able to honour a contract.
 
He's gone through all the pies in England already!??
 
Obvious troll thread is obvious.
 
Dogs have said they can't afford the $175000 transfer fee.
 
I fell for the bait... Ning, you pr!ck! [icon_lol1.
 
Kaz said:
Dogs have said they can't afford the $175000 transfer fee.

Saw Greenburg in an interview this morning and he was saying they definitely did want Eastwood back, but not so much Mason
 
Eastwood is a gun when he wants to be but once again - his inconsistency --> esp with his fitness/weight also a problem.

A very handy bench player IMO but a costly one.
 
Well they have changed their minds in 2 days

Dogs baulk at Eastwood transfer fee

Greenberg last night said he would not be willing to pay such a fee.

''Certainly not,'' Greenberg said. ''Last time I looked, we're not the Commonwealth Bank. As much as we'd like to have him, we can't afford those sorts of transfers.''
 
I'd rather have michaels back.... but given I'd rather neck myself than have michaels back that's not saying much.
 

Active Now

No members online now.
Top