- Sep 8, 2009
- 7,724
- 8,959
Out of the 8, second year in a row... And we're in!
- Thread starter badyon
- Start date
- Status
gordjw
NRL Player
- Jun 29, 2013
- 1,753
- 823
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
We're gone. The warriors have more Points For than we do.
We're gone. The warriors have more Points For than we do.
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,933
- 41,719
Danoz Direct
NRL Captain
- Oct 12, 2013
- 3,800
- 1,285
K-Style
NRL Player
- Jun 1, 2014
- 2,257
- 1,065
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
Both. For and against. If they lose by 2 or three they are behind us. Go Panthers.
Really looks like the Eels will go through but who really knows. Warriors can really turn on the points when they need to.
Both. For and against. If they lose by 2 or three they are behind us. Go Panthers.
Really looks like the Eels will go through but who really knows. Warriors can really turn on the points when they need to.
gordjw
NRL Player
- Jun 29, 2013
- 1,753
- 823
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
It's a pretty good chance actually. From memory the raiders usually play pretty well against Parra.
It's a pretty good chance actually. From memory the raiders usually play pretty well against Parra.
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,933
- 41,719
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
Hopefully Milford is in a good mood that he is just about out of that shithole and has a blinder and the Hayne plane crashes and burns
Hopefully Milford is in a good mood that he is just about out of that shithole and has a blinder and the Hayne plane crashes and burns
- Sep 8, 2009
- 7,724
- 8,959
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
@TripleM_NRL: FYI in the unlikely event Brisbane & Warriors finish level on for and against, the tiebreaker would be percentage. Broncos would advance
@TripleM_NRL: FYI in the unlikely event Brisbane & Warriors finish level on for and against, the tiebreaker would be percentage. Broncos would advance
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,933
- 41,719
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
if the Warriors lose by 3 then PD is equal. they have a slightly better FOR and we have a slightly better AGAINST
if the Warriors lose by 3 then PD is equal. they have a slightly better FOR and we have a slightly better AGAINST
badyon
QCup Player
- Feb 8, 2014
- 876
- 1,023
- Thread starter
- #248
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
Have you watched recent games against the bunnies, manly-girls and storm (home and away)?
Dead a long time ago.
lmao when ppl get excited about beating a reserve grade newy side, or a warriors side after a dominating hurrell goes off, or the dragqueens etc.
This side is hasn't done much since WB left. And nothing since Locky hung up the boots.
Sack Glenn. Sack Hoffman (unless he pulls his head in and plays wing).
Sack every other fucking **** that ins't bleeding pure maroon and gold tonight.
Have you watched recent games against the bunnies, manly-girls and storm (home and away)?
Dead a long time ago.
lmao when ppl get excited about beating a reserve grade newy side, or a warriors side after a dominating hurrell goes off, or the dragqueens etc.
This side is hasn't done much since WB left. And nothing since Locky hung up the boots.
Sack Glenn. Sack Hoffman (unless he pulls his head in and plays wing).
Sack every other fucking **** that ins't bleeding pure maroon and gold tonight.
vertigo
State of Origin Rep
- Mar 2, 2010
- 6,332
- 4,455
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
Goody.
Another 40 point thrashing like so many others before it.
Goody.
Another 40 point thrashing like so many others before it.
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,933
- 41,719
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
really a 40 point loss ... i must have been watching a different game to you.
really a 40 point loss ... i must have been watching a different game to you.
vertigo
State of Origin Rep
- Mar 2, 2010
- 6,332
- 4,455
Re: Out of the 8, second year in a row
I'm talking about the Storm thrashing us in finals, they would do us 2009 style.
I'm talking about the Storm thrashing us in finals, they would do us 2009 style.
- Status
