Here's another thought... Have we possibly seen James Roberts in Broncos colours for the last time..?
No, not at all. Why would you even think that? I am genuinely interested.
Pretty obvious why it was contrary conduct. You get a 50% loading for similar offences and only 25% for non-similar. A dangerous contact charge doesn't get him suspended (with an early plea).
Reckon they should fight it.....if there is a specific charge (kicking) usual rules of interpretation suggest that the less specific charge (contrary conduct) can't apply....generalia specialibus non derogant.
Absolutely it was a kick... and he should sit out a week.If this was Gallen, it's a kick any day of the week on here. Lots of blinkers on. He kicked him, I don't think he meant to, he looked to mean to shove, unfortunately, it ended up being a kick. He deserves to sit out the grub.
Absolutely it was a kick... and he should sit out a week.
But for me given they have charged him with a different charge than the others who have commited similar acts, i hope he gets off.
The only reason i see for him to be charged with a different offence is the higher loading contrary conduct gives him. And IMO, that stinks to high heaven
While Nathan Brown had no case to answer for stomping a player apparently because there wasn't enough force.
Yeah well if the Nathan Brown incident is anything to go by Roberts should get off, there was bugger all force, however I will not be surprised in the slightest when he gets a week. Its completely lucky dip stuff when it comes to the judiciary.
Didn't Brown get off because they found there wasn't enough force to cause injury? That should be our defence.