- Feb 27, 2010
- 29,871
- 12,197
Semantics, I should have said the FINAL verdict... Besides, why are you preaching to the choir? [icon_winkCoxy said:audragon said:I would give Inglis the benefit of the doubt, given the continued nature of his relationship with his fiancée.mrslong said:To make me hate the Roosters even more, I remind myself that their front rower is Jason Ryles.
It adds to the hate. Could you imagine his beady eyes on Grand Final day holding the premiership trophy? Ugh!
Greg Bird was found innocent Coxy, just like Inglis. I am hopeful the courts have got it right. [icon_shru
The Bird affair however, is not a simple slap in the face (not that it would be ok); it's a glassing in the face, nearly blinding the woman.
In court, there must be proof beyond doubt and Katie provided that doubt.
The verdict was one of: "we know he did it, but we can't prove it"
WRONG! The verdict was "he did it, we can prove it, he's guilty, and we're sentencing him to 12 months jail".
He then appealed, and managed to per$uade Katie to te$tify on hi$ behalf a completely new $tory that contradicted ju$t about all the evidence given in the trial...and the judge bought it.
He's guilty as sin.